Link Factor 9, Mr. Sulu...
Evolving Thoughts ponders the evolution of the term "atheism", and explains why it defines a species wholly different from his own non-theistic type.
A while ago, my own similar journey culminated in my self-description as an Ignostic, which seems to me the best-defined (and easily explained) and most philosophically sound "on the fence" position for one to assume; i.e. there are arguably no strong, weak, positive or negative Ignostics.
This is in part the reason I abandoned my highly popular and world-renown blog, "The Agnostic Monk". I was afraid that, to the uneducated visitor, "The Ignostic Monk" might be taken to indicate the the author was a regular theologian with some kind of rare congenital disorder.
[edited to add: Jings, I've never seen that before. There an add for "Dianetics" in the post-posting page on blogger! Weirdness...]
[edite once more to add: Now it's gone. Bizarre. And another thing: I've been posting old comments of mine to the archives of this blog so that I can a) stop repeating myself, and b) remember my thoughts, which tend to roll around my head like marbles and are always threatening to fall out of my ears. I hoped that back-dating them would prevent them from spamming everybody's Google Readers and what not, but my Statcounter says otherwise, so sorry about that.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Defining atheism
Monday, June 15, 2009
"W H E N in the Courfe of human Events..."
The Revolution Will Be ...
From The Big Picture, www.boston.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
